sikke said:
JeroenE said:
JejuSoul said:
ZuinigeRijder said:
That's cold! Lowest my car has ever got was -6°C. The battery heater has never come on. In your reading above the battery heater says 7°C when the outside temp is -3°C. Do you know how cold it has to get before that heater comes on automatically. (On my car the battery heater value is always zero, which means it is off. The display in Torque shows 0°C)sikke said:The car is one of the best i ever had regarding how fast it heats up the cabin and comfort when the temperature is around -15 to -26°C for a couple of weeks i january
JejuSoul said:
Yes, that is strange! Can you post again in a month or two when the values change.sikke said:
My last change was in dec 23, and since then I have made 4000km with no change in these numbers. January was pretty cold so a "winter effect" is an interesting theory. (We had lots of days with -15 -25C and the esimated range was down to around 115km at 100% SOC, and it seemed to be really accurate). I had expected the deterioration values to change during this period, but they did not.JejuSoul said:
I see the same tendency regarding the temperature of module 8. Normally it is about 2C above the rest, but during quickcharge #8 is significantly cooler than the others.JejuSoul said:
Max Cell Min Cell
First time logged 9.3% 0x20 8.3% 0x01
2015-11-05 18780km 9.8% 0x02 8.4% 0x08
2015-11-19 19751km 10.3% 0x18 9.2% 0x01
2015-12-23 22610km 11.2% 0x03 10.2% 0x08
2016-02-18 26667km 11.2% 0x03 10.2% 0x08 (Today, no change)Date km Max Cell Min Cell
24 October 2015 7,500.0 2.5 11 0.0 1
06 November 2015 7,750.0 3.5 2 0.1 83
06 December 2015 9,752.0 4.5 2 4.4 25
11 December 2015 10,033.0 6.0 4 3.1 1
23 December 2015 10,794.0 6.5 2 2.4 1
27 December 2015 10,997.0 6.5 2 2.8 1
23 February 2016 13,251.0 7.5 4 6.9 1Birkeland said:
ZuinigeRijder said:
BMS: 7EC 2101 - 2105
VMC: 7EA 2100 - 2102
OBC: 79C 2102
LDC: 7CD 2101Birkeland said:
We are not sure of the data. It is mostly consistent for all the cars tested, which represents multiple different climates. We don't know if the scale is correct. And we don't know if this will continue in a linear fashion.mtndrew1 said:
This is entirely consistent with the OBD data we are getting. ~21,000 miles = ~34,000km. We'd expect ~15% deterioration. That is 10% from the buffer and 5% from usable.mtndrew1 said:
I agree. Presumably the deterioration rate will not be linear. Kia seems confident in its guarantee. Yet what we are seeing is that nearly 100% of the cars will deteriorate faster. Hence the doubt in our numbers. It will be useful to see how the deterioration measured at a service center matches our own data.Birkeland said:
ZuinigeRijder said:
Birkeland said:
2 > atz
atzELM327 v1.5
3 > ati
atiELM327 v1.5
4 > atsp6
atsp6OK
5 > at sh 7e4
at sh 7e4OK
6 > 2101
210103D 0: 61 01 FF FF FF FF 1: 6E 23 28 23 28 03 00 2: 06 0E 2C 08 07 08 07 3: 07 07 07 00 08 BD 2B 4: BC 58 00 00 8E 00 01 5: 9C 94 00 01 A2 2C 00 6: 00 97 D2 00 00 95 13 7: 00 4A 2A DC 45 01 6B 8: 00 00 00 00 03 E8 00
7 > 2102
2102026 0: 61 02 FF FF FF FF 1: BD BD BD BD BD BD BD 2: BD BC BC BC BC BC BC 3: BD BC BC BC BC BC BC 4: BC BC BC BD BC BC BC 5: BC BC BC BC 00 00 00
8 > 2103
2103026 0: 61 03 FF FF FF FF 1: BC BC BD BC BC BC BC 2: BC BC BD BD BD BD BD 3: BD BD BD BD BD BD BD 4: BD BD BD BD BD BD BC 5: BC BC BC BC 00 00 00
9 > 2104
2104026 0: 61 04 FF FF FF FF 1: BC BC BC BD BC BC BC 2: BC BC BC BC BD BC BC 3: BC BC BC BC BD BC BC 4: BC BC BC BC BD BD BD 5: BD BD BD BD 00 00 00
10 > 2105
210502C 0: 61 05 FF FF FF FF 1: 00 00 00 00 00 07 07 2: 08 00 00 00 00 23 28 3: 23 28 00 01 50 00 00 4: 00 74 03 00 64 0F 72 5: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 6: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
